Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better backend docs #76

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024
Merged

Better backend docs #76

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024

Conversation

gdalle
Copy link
Member

@gdalle gdalle commented Mar 20, 2024

  • Add functions to check support for mutation and second-order differentiation
  • Use them to generate tables of backend functionalities, including backend combinations for hessians

@gdalle
Copy link
Member Author

gdalle commented Mar 20, 2024

Output preview (the table is scrollable):

image

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 89.47368% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.31%. Comparing base (6a771fb) to head (2a79f94).

Files Patch % Lines
src/backends.jl 88.88% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #76      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.26%   90.31%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          48       48              
  Lines        1653     1663      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         1492     1502      +10     
  Misses        161      161              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gdalle gdalle merged commit 2566c9f into main Mar 20, 2024
3 checks passed
@gdalle gdalle deleted the gd/backend_docs branch March 21, 2024 11:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants