Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider releasing binaries #49

Open
ticky opened this issue Oct 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Consider releasing binaries #49

ticky opened this issue Oct 5, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@ticky
Copy link

ticky commented Oct 5, 2024

Hi there, I’ve got a little project which makes use of evsieve, and I’ve got some users who want to use it but who aren’t confident in compiling code themselves.

I can pretty easily offer binaries of my project, but I am not sure it’s my place to build binaries of yours.

Would you consider building binaries of your project? You could in theory do this with GitHub actions and something like cargo dist.

@KarsMulder
Copy link
Owner

A cursory look at cargo-dist shows that there are several dubious aspects about its output, at least in its default configuration:

  • Does not use the operating system's native format for packages (like .deb, .rpm);
  • Suggests installation to happen through curl ... | sh;
  • Installs into ~/.cargo/bin.

So cargo-dist won't be used. That said, I too agree that it is time to start releasing official binaries. I am currently looking into setting up a pipeline to produce precompiled binaries.

@ticky
Copy link
Author

ticky commented Oct 8, 2024

Understandable, cargo-dist definitely has its sights set on being low-friction but not wide-ranging in its target outputs, and specifically working within the cargo ecosystem.

I look forward to your solution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants