Skip to content

Unprotected CMP error messages #121

Answered by primetomas
eerotuu asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

That section in RFC4210 is not really thought through imho. EJBCA signs some error messages, but not all.
Since EJBCA is multi-tennant, signing error messages when it's not even possible to identify the tennant does not make sense. It also exposes signing keys for unessecary risk, i.e. chosen plaintext attacks, or just very simple DDoS attacks if it's very simple to cause signings to be done by just sending crap to the http endpoint.
So you will find that some error messages is actually signed, when it has reached a little further and the response signing keys are actually identified. It's a bit of a balance there, in practice our approach has worked well for tons of use cases and differe…

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by eerotuu
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants