[Snyk] Security upgrade requests from 2.31.0 to 2.32.0

[Liam-Deacon]

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

• Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
  • requirements-doc.txt

⚠️ Warning

sphinx 5.3.0 has requirement docutils<0.20,>=0.14, but you have docutils 0.20.1.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

By pinning:

Severity	Priority Score (*)	Issue	Breaking Change	Exploit Maturity
	566/1000 Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.6	Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation SNYK-PYTHON-REQUESTS-6928867	No	No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.

---

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

---

Note: This is a default PR template raised by Snyk. Find out more about how you can customise Snyk PRs in our documentation.

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

[sourcery-ai]

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:

• It seems to have been created by a bot ('[Snyk]' found in title). We assume it knows what it's doing!
• We don't currently review documentation changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
Report missing for 3469d721	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (3469d72)	Report Missing	Report Missing	Report Missing
Head commit (fda5c3a)	3688	92	2.49%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#102)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy will stop sending the deprecated coverage status from June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

Footnotes

1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 2.49%. Comparing base (c4b918c) to head (fda5c3a).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #102   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    2.49%   2.49%           
======================================
  Files          15      15           
  Lines        3688    3688           
======================================
  Hits           92      92           
  Misses       3596    3596           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.