Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
fix typo
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
Loosetooth committed Sep 27, 2023
1 parent 24268e4 commit b24f74b
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion pages/introduction.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -29,6 +29,6 @@ The third basic experiment is Anderson's 1932 discovery of the "creation" and "a

The only physical explanation for the possibility of the electron-positron pair 'creation' and 'annihilation' is that the empty space is densely populated by these particles. Unfortunately for the epola model, this contradicts our natural perception of space as an emptiness, in which the allegedly dense and continuous bodies of atomic matter can move without facing any resistance. However, experimental facts draw an opposite picture of almost empty atomic bodies, completely penetrable to the bound electrons and positrons of the epola space. Motion of atomic bodies in the epola is the motion of their atomic nuclei, their orbital and 'free' electrons, in channels between epola particles. The particle-density in the epola is billions of times larger than in atomic bodies. Hence, the motion of atomic bodies in the epola does not face any resistance, up to certain limiting velocities. Similarly, a net, mad of widely spaced then threads can slowly move in air or water without resistance, and without causing winds or currents in these ambients.

The billions of times higher particle density in the epola also explains why the motion of the almost-empty atomic bodies cannot cause 'winds' in the epola carrier of light, or push or pull the epola. Hence, the results of Michson-Morley's experiment are in full agreement with the epola model of space; one may say that they follow naturally from this model. Therefore, there is no need to force upon us a belief in a four-dimensional space, which contradicts our natural perception and our life and laboratory experience. There is also no need in tyrranic requests that the velocity of light and all physical laws established in our backyard must be the same in the whole universe. The epola model also dismisses some paradoxes of relativity, as time dilation, length contraction, clock or twin effects, or the Big Bang-created exploding universe. The epola model allows us to derive and explain the experimentally-proven postulates, principles and laws of quantum physics and relativity. With few physical assumptions and the aid of basic calculus it unifies these two branches oh physics and enables a unified treatment of all out-of-nuclei physical phenomena.
The billions of times higher particle density in the epola also explains why the motion of the almost-empty atomic bodies cannot cause 'winds' in the epola carrier of light, or push or pull the epola. Hence, the results of Michelson-Morley's experiment are in full agreement with the epola model of space; one may say that they follow naturally from this model. Therefore, there is no need to force upon us a belief in a four-dimensional space, which contradicts our natural perception and our life and laboratory experience. There is also no need in tyrranic requests that the velocity of light and all physical laws established in our backyard must be the same in the whole universe. The epola model also dismisses some paradoxes of relativity, as time dilation, length contraction, clock or twin effects, or the Big Bang-created exploding universe. The epola model allows us to derive and explain the experimentally-proven postulates, principles and laws of quantum physics and relativity. With few physical assumptions and the aid of basic calculus it unifies these two branches oh physics and enables a unified treatment of all out-of-nuclei physical phenomena.

All this for the price of accepting the experimentally-proven 'emptiness' of atomic bodies and the so-much-higher density of bound particles in space. This seemingly-paradoxical 'etherized' atomic matter and 'solidified' space are still less paradoxical than the alternatives, which stay in physics now.

0 comments on commit b24f74b

Please sign in to comment.