Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Succinyl Lysine derivatization #534

Open
SourceForge-exporter opened this issue Aug 10, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Succinyl Lysine derivatization #534

SourceForge-exporter opened this issue Aug 10, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@SourceForge-exporter
Copy link

MOD:01314 represents the reagent-labeling experiment with succinic anhydride using "natural abundance" succinic anhydride.
MOD:01315 is the same experiment as MOD:01314 where 1H4 is replaced with 2H4
MOD:01316 is the same experiment as MOD:01314 where 12C4 is replaced with 13C4

Therefore

MOD:01314 should NOT be is_a MOD:01426, it should be is_a MOD:00848
MOD:01315 should be is_a MOD:01426
MOD:01316 should be is_a MOD:01426

Reported by: pmthomas

@SourceForge-exporter
Copy link
Author

MOD:01314 4x(1)H,4x(12)C-labeled N6-succinyl-L-lysine is_a
MOD:01819 N6-succinyl-L-lysine
which is the natural isotope abundance form and has "Source: natural" while MOD:01314 is specifically the isotope labeled form. And since all specifically isotope labeled forms are regarded as artificial, it has "Source: artifact". Likewise, MOD:01315 and MOD:01316 are specifically isotope labeled forms, and so all are MOD:01426 isotope tagged reagent derivatized residue. The difference between MOD:01314 and MOD:01819 is that the average mw's are 228.11 and 228.25 respectively (MOD:01819 includes the natural abundance heavier isotopes in the average but not the most common isotope calculation, while MOD:01314 uses the most common light isotopes for both). Usually I will not be creating duplicate entries for the "natural" most common isotope form, but this was either something done in UniMod or a request.
In MS work the average mw is never measured, only the combinatorial isotope masses --- if you have sufficient resolution.

Original comment by: jsgaravelli

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant