Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Format: Major updates following requirements for MISP core #159

Open
adulau opened this issue Aug 27, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Format: Major updates following requirements for MISP core #159

adulau opened this issue Aug 27, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
help wanted This is an issue that community can help with S: stale Status: stale. This issue has had no activity in a long time, it may not be relevant anymore T: enhancement Type: enhancement. This issue is not a bug, it improves an existing feature topic: format

Comments

@adulau
Copy link
Member

adulau commented Aug 27, 2019

  • New meta field at all levels (namespace, predicate and value) to follow same strategies as galaxy for third-party information
    • Such as original_numerical_value for numerical_value set by the original taxonomy.
    • History meta field to explain the updates of the taxonomy.
  • New no_decay at value level to unset the decaying.
@enjeck enjeck added help wanted This is an issue that community can help with S: stale Status: stale. This issue has had no activity in a long time, it may not be relevant anymore T: enhancement Type: enhancement. This issue is not a bug, it improves an existing feature labels Nov 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
help wanted This is an issue that community can help with S: stale Status: stale. This issue has had no activity in a long time, it may not be relevant anymore T: enhancement Type: enhancement. This issue is not a bug, it improves an existing feature topic: format
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@adulau @enjeck