You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
By definition, all containers in a Podman pod share the same network namespace. This fact means that they will have the same IP address, MAC addresses, and port mappings. You can conveniently communicate between containers in a pod by using localhost.
This means, that if I put Pi-hole and Unbound in the same Podman network, they will fight over port 53 (and it's the problem I'm running into now).
This means that the only way to make this work would be to put them in separate networks, expose their ports and have them communicate over the host instead of talking each other in the same network.
@MatthewVance do you think Podman support is a good enough reason to customize the port?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have seen and read #30, but it has one big assumption - using Docker.
According to Podman docs:
This means, that if I put Pi-hole and Unbound in the same Podman network, they will fight over port 53 (and it's the problem I'm running into now).
This means that the only way to make this work would be to put them in separate networks, expose their ports and have them communicate over the host instead of talking each other in the same network.
@MatthewVance do you think Podman support is a good enough reason to customize the port?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: