Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow to bind to other ports #49

Open
Quintasan opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Allow to bind to other ports #49

Quintasan opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
type: feature suggestion Suggesting a new feature

Comments

@Quintasan
Copy link

I have seen and read #30, but it has one big assumption - using Docker.

According to Podman docs:

By definition, all containers in a Podman pod share the same network namespace. This fact means that they will have the same IP address, MAC addresses, and port mappings. You can conveniently communicate between containers in a pod by using localhost.

This means, that if I put Pi-hole and Unbound in the same Podman network, they will fight over port 53 (and it's the problem I'm running into now).

This means that the only way to make this work would be to put them in separate networks, expose their ports and have them communicate over the host instead of talking each other in the same network.

@MatthewVance do you think Podman support is a good enough reason to customize the port?

@Quintasan Quintasan added the type: feature suggestion Suggesting a new feature label Dec 18, 2023
@Jason-Keller
Copy link

running into this issue as well -- have a pihole running in portainer alongside unbound and they are fighting over port 53

@mjurksa
Copy link

mjurksa commented Aug 9, 2024

Just edit the unbound.conf in /opt/unbound/etc/unbound

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: feature suggestion Suggesting a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants