-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 677
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There are questions about the parameters needed for forward propagation in model transformation #926
Comments
Here is my conversion script, based on the previous question, I tried to enter the parameters needed for the forward channel during the conversion:
But the following error was reported:
|
Hi @huangshilong911 , Thanks for reaching out again. It looks like the error occurs during the execution of the PyTorch model. Do you experience this error simply by calling the following? output = SlimSAM_model(*[batched_input, multimask_output]) Best, |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello john, once again I have to ask for your advice sincerely.
In a previous demo, I was able to successfully convert a .pth to a .engine model with the following code:
However, while performing the conversion against the slim_sam model, the need for a forward channel input parameter arose and I had to modify the code to the following form:
But even so, the script still doesn't run well, it still prompts me that I did parameter or entered the wrong parameter, is there any way to solve this situation?
In addition, I referred to the work you recommended to me on nanosam, which also seems to add parameters to the conversion process, which seems to be informative, and I would like to ask for advice on whether I should operate the same way as this work. If so, what should I do?
The relevant operations for the nanosam work are as follows:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: