-
Dear all, I have been using the curl model to simulate floating wind farm in FAST.Farm. I have used the parameters as recommended in your most recent publication. However, I am running the 15MW on a semisubmersible floater and not the 5MW. I used the vtk files to extract the velocities at the hub height plane (XY plane at hub height), and drew the velocity deficits as shown below. The Figure shows three turbines in a row behind each other with a distance of 6D between each turbine. The Figure represents the deficit at hub height behind each turbine at a distance of 5D. Turbine 2 sees the undisturbed inflow then turbine 5 is behind it and turbine 8 is at the end of the row. The Figure shows an asymmetry in the wake deficit which i am unable to explain. Can you help me understand why the asymmetry exist? Thanks in advance Best regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Dear @MYMahfouz, The curled wake model of FAST.Farm naturally has inherent asymmetry, dependent on the inflow-skew angle. You haven't stated what conditions you are simulating, but presumably the inflow relative to the rotor is skewed a bit (due to tilt, yaw, or floater motion). Best regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Thanks for clarifying. Indeed, that is sizeable amount of skew, which will lead to an asymmetric wake.
The
RtSkew
output from AeroDyn is the inflow angle, i.e., the angle between the rotor-disk averaged relative wind velocity (including the effect of wind variation and structural velocity along each blade) and the axis normal to the rotor. This skew is computed universally, and so, can include effects from both tilt and yaw. While your yaw may be small, the tilt could be sizeable due to shaft tilt, tower deflection, and floater pitch, in combination with the yaw.Best regards,