Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CLI: support execute from workflow.yaml #621

Open
josephjclark opened this issue Mar 5, 2024 · 11 comments
Open

CLI: support execute from workflow.yaml #621

josephjclark opened this issue Mar 5, 2024 · 11 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@josephjclark
Copy link
Collaborator

josephjclark commented Mar 5, 2024

Overview

The OpenFn CLI currently supports running jobs through a job/expression file (ie, openfn job.js) or a workflow file (ie, openfn workflow.json)

Users of Lightning (the hosted platform at openfn.org) can sync their projects (including multiple workflows) with github. This in effect allows them to write and test their workflows locally, commit them to a github repo, and deploy that repo to Lightning. See the docs at: https://docs.openfn.org/documentation/link-to-Github

The project is saved locally in a file called project.yaml. Unfortunately, users cannot yet execute a workflow inside a project.yaml using the CLI.

Suggested Fix

It should be fairly straightforward for the CLI to import a project.yaml file, convert it into a standard Workflow object, and then execute it as usual.

Since a project.yaml file can contain multiple workflows, the CLI should support a --workflow (shorthanded to -w) argument which specifies the workflow by id. If the project only contains one workflow, we can just go ahead and use that without the -w argument.

Implementation Notes

Within the CLI and the kit repo, workflows are often known as Execution Plans. Technically an Execution Plan is a wrapper around a workflow which can include options (and maybe later metadata). Tthe terms workflow/excution plan/xplan and plan are used pretty much interchangably - this was to help divorce the platform's Workflow concept from the CLI's equivalent, which used to be a little different.

This fix should be implemented in packages/cli, integrated into the existing execute command.

There is a file in src/utils/load-plan.ts which is designed to load a workflow from a .js or .json file. You should extend the main loadPlan() to support a projectPath option (see src/options.ts::export const inputPath)

You should use the yaml npm package to handle yaml file parsing (pnpm add yaml)

See the lexicon package for type definitions for ExecutionPlan, which is the workflow structure you need to generate from the yaml.

You can see some project.yaml examples in this issue: #619

Any properties in project.yaml which are not reflected in workflow.json can safely be ignored.

Testing

Unit tests should be created to demonstrate that project.yaml. Adding good coverage to test/util/load-plan.test.ts should suffice.

A test should also be added to test/commands.test.ts which loads a yaml flie. These tests use a mock file system - see the other tests for a good reference pattern.

I would also love to see an integration test added to /integration-tests/cli/execute-workflow.ts. Create a project.yaml fixture, load it into your test, and assert on the result.

Other Notes

Other issues may well arise when trying to execute a project.yaml file. I think it's a fairly straightforward mapping but some unforeseen incompatibility could well crop up. In this event, please raise issues here on github (and maybe tag @josephjclark for help).

We welcome feedback on the docs inside this repo! Did the readme help you get started? Are you able to find the code you needed? Is there anything that would have made your work easier?

@josephjclark josephjclark added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Mar 5, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to New Issues in v2 Mar 5, 2024
@christad92 christad92 moved this from New Issues to Icebox in v2 Mar 8, 2024
@josephjclark

This comment was marked as outdated.

@josephjclark

This comment was marked as outdated.

@josephjclark

This comment was marked as outdated.

@josephjclark

This comment was marked as outdated.

@josephjclark

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Akshanshkaushal

This comment was marked as outdated.

@josephjclark

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Akshanshkaushal

This comment was marked as outdated.

@josephjclark

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Akshanshkaushal

This comment was marked as outdated.

@josephjclark

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
Status: Icebox
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants