Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to LCLS 2.2 #530

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

Update to LCLS 2.2 #530

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

awisniew90
Copy link
Contributor

Tested on Eclipse 2024-09

Signed-off-by: Adam Wisniewski <[email protected]>
@awisniew90 awisniew90 requested a review from mezarin December 2, 2024 15:39
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
</parent>

<properties>
<liberty.ls.version>2.1.2</liberty.ls.version>
<liberty.ls.version>2.2</liberty.ls.version>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change is good, but you also need to update:

  • ci/scans/dependency-only-mend-pom.xml. It also looks like you need to update the mp.ls version in this file also.
  • While you are at it, you can also update the LSP4Jakarta version to the latest. One was created last week.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @mezarin - I'm going to look into the MP and Jakarta LS versions in another issue/PR. The dependency pom also needs a bit of a rework, so have another todo for that.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok sounds good. Approving since the requested updates are going in a separate PR.

@awisniew90 awisniew90 merged commit 15e4cc9 into OpenLiberty:main Dec 6, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants