You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sometimes, in particular under high IOPs load, those values are simply too high:
>SELECT esx,datastore,datastore_totalwritelatency_average,datastore_totalreadlatency_average
FROM vsphere_virtualmachine WHERE datastore_totalreadlatency_average >60000LIMIT1
name: vsphere_virtualmachine
time esx datastore datastore_totalwritelatency_average datastore_totalreadlatency_average
---- --- --------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------2018-03-24T16:20:02Z esxi3.dasecommercee.lan Eqldatastore1 1160172583248652049638230411510
That's a huge 3768,8 years.
I have encountered this behavior with VCSA version 6.5.0.13000, while in VCSA 6.0 it works fine.
It seems that the timestamp at the end of the measurement taken from VCSA, is going into the InfluxDB field for some reason. I have tried to look at the debug output, but don't know what I have to look for.
Can the new VCSA apply some unwanted formatting on the high IOPs value, or on the whole measurement row, under load?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's funny because i've had the same issue, from times to times, with 6.5 ( iirc @exbane as well ), but hadn't actually gotten around to fixing it since i also use NetApp Harvest to get datastore-level stats from it, so not having correct VM-level data isn't the end of the world.
Have you had the possibility to check if the Monitor -> Performance tab in the vSphere Web Client reports similar values for latency ?
Sometimes, in particular under high IOPs load, those values are simply too high:
That's a huge 3768,8 years.
I have encountered this behavior with VCSA version 6.5.0.13000, while in VCSA 6.0 it works fine.
It seems that the timestamp at the end of the measurement taken from VCSA, is going into the InfluxDB field for some reason. I have tried to look at the debug output, but don't know what I have to look for.
Can the new VCSA apply some unwanted formatting on the high IOPs value, or on the whole measurement row, under load?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: