Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks @mglev1n, we agree and have opened some issues to explore how to make this step faster. It will coincide with allowing wide scoring files (e.g. multiple weights for a single set of variants) as well. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
When using
pgsc_calc
for more than a few scores, the pipeline seems to take a very long time. Despite using the--parallel
argument and having access to HPC resources, the step that combines scores into a single scoring file seems to run serially (reading score1, performing QC, appending to scoring file; reading score2, performing QC, appending, ...). Is there a more efficient approach for creating a combined scoring file (either using thepgsc_calc
pipeline, or preparing the combined scoring file prior to running the pipeline)?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions