You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 31, 2024. It is now read-only.
Since Python 3.5 there is a new and for higher dimensions semantically more intuitive version of a matrix multiplication operator @. We usually deal with 2-D inputs, when we use the dot-functions, but we might easily move to higher dimensional operations by simply using the @ and would be more on the brink of Python developments.
We should thus consider shifting to @.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Since Python 3.5 there is a new and for higher dimensions semantically more intuitive version of a matrix multiplication operator
@
. We usually deal with 2-D inputs, when we use the dot-functions, but we might easily move to higher dimensional operations by simply using the@
and would be more on the brink of Python developments.We should thus consider shifting to
@
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: