Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

(user submitted) Latin morphological omissions and improvements #21

Open
lcerrato opened this issue May 19, 2020 · 11 comments
Open

(user submitted) Latin morphological omissions and improvements #21

lcerrato opened this issue May 19, 2020 · 11 comments
Labels
Latin

Comments

@lcerrato
Copy link
Contributor

lcerrato commented May 19, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Going to compile some user suggestions here. I'm not endorsing or verifying the accuracy.
NB auto correct may have worked its magic so let me know if something is unclear.
@lcerrato lcerrato added the Latin label May 19, 2020
@lcerrato
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcerrato commented May 19, 2020 •
edited
Loading

  • 1. superlative of difficilis, -e (difficillimus, -a, -um) is wrong in your database (difficilissimus)

  • 2. "alitem" is linked to "aliter" and not "ales"

  • 3. "volgari" is linked to "volgus"

  • 4. missing vocative singular: Corneli, Furi, Aureli

  • 5. velator not found

  • 6. indies not found

  • 7. Lewis & Short dictionary lists 'fauce' under fauces (for ablative) but 'nothing
    found'

  • 8. Ulixi should be irregular genitive

  • 9. filiabus not found (abl. plural of filia); deabus not found

  • 10. "diligentissime" (sc. " masc/neut voc superl sg") is not correct. should be: "diligentissime voc superl sg"

  • 11. sonaci should be ablative not dative

  • 12. arrectos arrectus arrectis and arrecti derive from arrigio not arrideo

  • 13. proconsularis is listed as a verb not an adjective

  • 14. unable to recognize the Latin word 'as'

  • 15. fons listed as f when it is masculine

  • 16. consuerant listed as from consuo but it is an alternative form of the pluperfect indicative active 3rd person plural of consuesco.

  • 17. no result for memento

  • 18. no result for cremaverunt

  • 19. no results for ungendi

  • 20. no results for mearis, meare, meavi, mearent

  • 21. tonitrua links only to tonitruo, are, and not to tonitruus/ tonitruum (the correct word)

  • 22. lita not found (neither is verb lino)

@lcerrato
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcerrato commented May 20, 2020 •
edited
Loading

  • 23. merged in 12
  • 24. proderit should be listed as form of prodo
  • 25. simulatque resolves to verb instead of simul
  • 26. fugacia not found
  • 27. Pyrois and Pyroeis not found
  • 28. 1st person plural, subjunctive, Imperfect forms like laudaremus or visitaremus not found

@lcerrato
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcerrato commented May 21, 2020 •
edited
Loading

  • 29. aere not listed as derivative of aes (see 37 below as lemma is also missing)
  • 30. accipitrem is incorrectly given as first person singular subjunctive of accipitro; It is the accusative singular of accipiter
  • 31. obice is not imp.pres. of the word obicio/obicere, but the abl. of the word "obex"
  • 32. pectin not listed as being derived from pecten
  • 33. obvolvo not found (no lemma)

@lcerrato
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcerrato commented May 26, 2020 •
edited
Loading

  • 34. truci is also ablative singular as well as dative singular
  • 35. discordis and discordia from discors not found (neither the forms nor the lemma)
  • 36. vir not found (likewise derivative forms such as viro)
  • 37. aes (bronze) not found
  • 38. synodus confusion result for lemma priestly college is not shown (meaning is given as fish) but when you click on LS link, you get the college
  • 39. “litora” from various places in The Aeneid (e.g., line 3) gets me to an analysis page that defines litus3 as “to labor in vain, take useless pains,” an incorrect translation. The linked Lewis & Short entry correctly defines litus as seashore (and has no third sense of the word, as far as I can tell) (NB entry in LS has been fixed)
  • 40. Please note that when one clicks on ' adiuero' the word tool cites
    The verb 'adeo' and gives adiuero as "verb 1st sing fut of ind act"
    And does not cite the other meaning for 'adiuero'. 'adiuero' as used in the text is the 1st sg fut ind act of 'adiuvo' meaning to aid, help or assist, adiuero being a form for 'adiuvero'

@lcerrato
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • 41. nequissimus not listed from nequam
  • 42. ite listed as singular instead of plural
  • 43. lepos (alternative form of lepor) not found
  • 44. proceres does not resolve to procer (noun) which itself is not found
  • 45. 4th form of liber (bark) not found
  • 46. virtus listed as masc instead of feminine
  • 47. strepent or perstrepent, third person plural indicative active forms of strepo and perstrepo, respectively are not found. The only future indicative form that is correctly analyzed is (per)strepet; forms other than future indicative are correctly identified.
  • 48. desuetis from desuesco not found (neither is the verb)
  • 49. volucris can be nominative feminine plural –– rare, but occasional in third declension i-stems according to A&G New Latin Grammar, § 77, page 32
  • 50. rogavisti not found

@lcerrato
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcerrato commented May 27, 2020 •
edited
Loading

  • 51. excerno, excernis, excrevi not found
  • 52. tonitrua resolves to verb tonitruo, tonitruare; should be accusative plural of the neuter noun tonitruum, -i (alternate tonitrus, -us m.)
  • 53. lemma ventus (wind) not found
  • 54. pepigissent pepigi should be linked to pango
  • 55. (merged in 12)
  • 56. volandi is gerund not gerundive
  • 57. iuerint is not a form of eo, ire 'to go' but the 3Plur Pres Perf Subj of iuvo, iuvare 'to help'. The standard classical form would be written iuverint; iuerint is a by-form.
  • 58. ales must in fact be the adjective ales, "winged," or perhaps the substantive derived from it, "bird." (currently identified as 2nd sg fut ind act of the verb alo, "to feed, nourish.")
  • 59. desides = pl masc voc of the adjective dēses, "inactive, indolent, idle" option not found
  • 60. crumina = crumena (noun not found only verb)

@lcerrato
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcerrato commented May 27, 2020 •
edited
Loading

  • 61. venis from vena (noun) not found
  • 62. penes lemma not found
  • 63. unguine resolves to "unguis (a nail)". unguine is the ablative singular of "unguen" (not found)
  • 64. desciverant should be listed as derivative of descisco

@lcerrato
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcerrato commented Jun 5, 2020

  • 65. loop between singulis and singuli — can't actually get to any entries
  • 66. truci comes up as only dative singular but it is also abl. sing (noted by LS)
  • 67. vestis lemma not found
  • 68. quod not found (may be a stop word)
  • 69. resolves to a bunch of lemmata most of which are incorrect and just LS prefixes
  • 70. pix, picis not found (no lemma pix = pitch)
  • 71. pertexere (Lucretius 6.42) is linked to pertego in Lewis & Short. That’s wrong; the link should be to pertexo.
  • 72. oblita s/b oblino not obliviscor
  • 73. proscidit not found (proscindo not found either -> resolves to scindo)
  • 74. opponitur resolves to pono instead of oppono
  • 75. lemma character not found

@lcerrato
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • 76. alites linked to aliter instead of ales (winged) in Horace Epodes 5.100

@lcerrato lcerrato mentioned this issue Jun 1, 2022
Closed
@lcerrato
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • 77. accesstis as syncopated form of accessistis is not found
  • 78. crevit is linked only to cerno and not cresco
  • 79. consuerunt should be the abbreviated form for conseuerunt Caes. Gal. 6.14
  • 80. orare from orior? seems incorrect
  • 81. vitium links to the Lewis and Short entry for vitis, “vine,” when the word is clearly vitium, -i, n., “vice, crime.”
  • 82. viridarium not found

@lcerrato
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • 83. vomere links to vomō only, when it surely should be to vōmer, ĕris, m.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Latin
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lcerrato