You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems that recent changes have improved RAM consumption on initial push...
... but secondary push and some commands, like check, exhaust RAM resources.
This is counter-intuitie since first push is supposedly the most costly operation and check is supposedly very cheap, so something needs to be investigated here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
identified as side effects from ram -> ldb switch and a missing tmp cleanup: leads mfs tmp directories to retain objects in memory.
as an additional improvement I made sure we don't keep too many vfs and indexes in memory simultaneously, the refactor is committed in branch ldb-cleanup pending some testing before merging to main.
It seems that recent changes have improved RAM consumption on initial push...
... but secondary push and some commands, like check, exhaust RAM resources.
This is counter-intuitie since first push is supposedly the most costly operation and check is supposedly very cheap, so something needs to be investigated here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: