You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some software tools need the header description to properly parse fasta header with default parameters. We do not have this in the current fasta proposed for the DDA and DIA modules.
So we decided to generate a fasta with these descriptions and the same sequences as the ones in the fasta that we currently use.
I had a look at it and: problem!
Whatever I do, we won't have description for all the accessions because:
some accessions are "weird" but necessary: the spiked in biognosys iRTs have no descriptions; and some sequences in the contaminants are tags or else (hence, no header description).
some accessions are deleted or not annotated anymore in Uniprot.
So, whatever I do there will be accessions without descriptions.
Will this be an issue for some software tools? If yes, how do I proceed? What do I do with the sequences that are not "real" proteins?
@wolski: do you have an opinion on how to proceed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Some software tools need the header description to properly parse fasta header with default parameters. We do not have this in the current fasta proposed for the DDA and DIA modules.
So we decided to generate a fasta with these descriptions and the same sequences as the ones in the fasta that we currently use.
I had a look at it and: problem!
Whatever I do, we won't have description for all the accessions because:
So, whatever I do there will be accessions without descriptions.
Will this be an issue for some software tools? If yes, how do I proceed? What do I do with the sequences that are not "real" proteins?
@wolski: do you have an opinion on how to proceed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: