-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RecursionError on large lambda expression #1792
Comments
please read the issue template and the choices before you get to the issue template |
Sorry about that. Just from an outsider's perspective, it's not obvious to me what counts as "a check" and what doesn't. The word "check" didn't appear in my error message, and I know nothing about the internal workings of flake8. Also, this problem with F___ codes didn't pattern-match for me, maybe because my error message,
doesn't contain any numerical code. I wonder if a heading like, problem with F___ codes (or "pyflakes[F]") would be more helpful. |
well it didn't say "flake8" failed did it? it said "pyflakes" failed |
Fair enough. Learning more as I go here! Digging a bit more, it looks like maybe my issue is just a duplicate of PyCQA/pyflakes#231. Anyway, thanks very much for your work on this project, and apologies for the time waste! |
how did you install flake8?
unmodified output of
flake8 --bug-report
describe the problem
what I expected to happen
flake8 succeeds with no issues
sample code
The module
foo.py
simply defines a single, giant lambda function:commands ran
If I run with the verbose switch,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: