You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
question1: why the mape is so big? are these results correct?
I wanted to get the predictions and manually compare them with the labels using the following code:
forecaster.eval()
test_dataloader = data_module.test_dataloader()
for batch in test_dataloader:
# Extract input features from the batch
xc, yc, xt, yt = batch # Assuming these are the keys in your dataset
# Make predictions using the forecaster
yt_pred = forecaster.predict(xc, yc, xt,yt)
print(yt_pred)
print(yt)
break
question2: In AL-solar, there are no negatives but the labels have some negative values? are the some scaling going on in here?
question3: even then my predictions are not at all near to the labels (I am using the provided prediction method), any idea why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Upon using python train.py lstnet solar_energy --context_points 168 --target_points 24 --run_name spatiotemporal_al_solar --batch_size 25:
test/loss 0.11
test/mae. 1.82
test/mape 19922692
test/mse 12.67
test/norm_mae 0.18
test/norm_mse. 0.11
test/smape. 1.417
question1: why the mape is so big? are these results correct?
I wanted to get the predictions and manually compare them with the labels using the following code:
This is the output:
`tensor([[[ 0.2024, 0.0527, 0.0133, ..., -0.0635, 0.0884, -0.0149],
[ 0.2010, 0.0525, 0.0131, ..., -0.0636, 0.0879, -0.0150],
[ 0.2041, 0.0523, 0.0131, ..., -0.0637, 0.0892, -0.0148],
...,
[ 0.7595, 0.0227, 0.0320, ..., -0.0812, 0.2956, 0.0085],
[ 0.8442, 0.0236, 0.0376, ..., -0.0806, 0.3280, 0.0181],
[ 0.8337, 0.0235, 0.0369, ..., -0.0809, 0.3239, 0.0163]],
tensor([[[-0.8025, -0.7136, -0.6984, ..., -0.7011, -0.7864, -0.6945],
[-0.8025, -0.7136, -0.6984, ..., -0.7011, -0.7864, -0.6945],
[-0.8025, -0.7136, -0.6984, ..., -0.7011, -0.7864, -0.6945],
...,
[ 0.9684, 0.1093, 0.3574, ..., 0.3511, 1.0403, 0.2583],
[ 1.0116, 0.2213, 0.5154, ..., 0.5210, 1.1411, 0.4755],
[ 1.0467, 0.4340, 0.6848, ..., 0.6800, 1.2230, 0.7388]],
question2: In AL-solar, there are no negatives but the labels have some negative values? are the some scaling going on in here?
question3: even then my predictions are not at all near to the labels (I am using the provided prediction method), any idea why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: