-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Techniques.Rmd
54 lines (37 loc) · 2.92 KB
/
Techniques.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
---
title: "Full list of Techniques and references"
author: "Roel M. Hogervorst"
date: "`r Sys.Date()`"
output: rmarkdown::html_vignette
vignette: >
%\VignetteIndexEntry{Full list of Techniques and references}
%\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown}
%\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8}
---
```{r setup, include = FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(
collapse = TRUE,
comment = "#>"
)
```
GRIMMER
- [PeerJ preprint](https://peerj.com/preprints/2400/) by Jordan Anaya
Anaya J. 2016. The GRIMMER test: A method for testing the validity of reported measures of variability. PeerJ Preprints 4:e2400v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2400v1
GRIM https://osf.io/t47wf/
Heathers JA, Anaya J, van der Zee T, Brown NJ. 2018. Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE) PeerJ Preprints 6:e26968v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1
Used the r implementation found on https://osf.io/scpbz/
Anaya, J. (2016). The GRIMMER test: A method for testing the validity of repeated measures of variability. PeerJ Preprints, 4, e2400v1.
Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The GRIM test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363-369.
Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2019). Rounded Input Variables, Exact Test Statistics (RIVETS): A technique for detecting hand-calculated results in published research. Unpublished paper. Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, USA 02115.
Heathers, J., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. L. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample parameter reconstruction via iterative techniques (SPRITE). Peerj Preprints. doi.org/10.7287/ peerj.preprints.26968v1.
Heathers, J. A., & Brown, N. J. (2019). DEBIT: A simple consistency test for binary data. Unpublished paper. Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA. USA 02115.
---investigate:
Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., and Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical
reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior research methods, 48(4):1205–1226.
Simonsohn, U. (2013). Just post it: The lesson from two cases of fabricated data detected by statistics alone. Psychological
science, 24(10):1875–1888.
Veldkamp, C. L., Nuijten, M. B., Dominguez-Alvarez, L., van Assen, M. A., and Wicherts, J. M. (2014). Statistical
reporting errors and collaboration on statistical analyses in psychological science. PloS one, 9(12):e114876.
Wilner, S., Wood, K., and Simons, D. (2018). Complete recovery of values in diophantine systems (corvids). PsyArXiv. Wolins, L. (1962). Responsibility for raw data. American Psychologist, 17(9):657–658.
https://github.com/katherinemwood/corvids
https://katherinemwood.github.io/post/corvids/