-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 343
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Trouble understanding mSkipAxis #577
Comments
The purpose of Can you check and see if the same issue occurs with your BigBen controller when |
Ah, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining, that makes my original interpretation of how it works wrong. The edge case remains, though, so will look into this. |
Something like this might improve If you think this implementation is incorrect or may still cause edge cases, let me know... otherwise I can submit as-is. |
Thanks. Yes, I do think that's the possible edge case, but let me test this first. (After the weekend, though.) |
Maybe just leave it as it is for now. The edge case I described is just that - an edge case. I will try to offer a proper fix for #568 some time later, but until then the existing behaviour of EmulationStation seems fine. Thanks. |
I'm having trouble understanding
mSkipAxis
infilterTrigger()
.The variable isn't setup and just assumed to be false.
Once it's true, it stays true, even if the device configuration later reaches a non-Trigger inputID and the device wants to use Axis 2 or 5 there.
So there can be edge cases where a device won't configure properly.
Would it be okay to just remove
mSkipAxis
, even if it causes more calls tostrstr
during the configuration run?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: