Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discuss naming of FlavorTransformations #366

Open
JostMigenda opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Discuss naming of FlavorTransformations #366

JostMigenda opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Milestone

Comments

@JostMigenda
Copy link
Member

  • I’d like to rename MSWEffect, since that name sounds so generic that novice users would likely expect that to be the basic MSW case. Something like CustomMSW or AdvancedMSW would be clearer (and more consistent with AdiabaticMSW, NonAdiabaticMSW and their four-flavour equivalents, which all drop the “Effect” from the class name).

I agree, CustomMSW would be better here.
I kept all the class names initially defined by Jim in his branch, and didn't change anything because I'm not sure I have enough understanding of underlying physics 😃
But it will be good if we can come with a more clear naming convention in a discussion.

But probably we should do the renaming in a separate PR, it will be rather straightforward.

From discussion with @Sheshuk in #351 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant