Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document the authoring of CAMP required input models #18

Closed
jesus-gorronogoitia opened this issue Sep 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Document the authoring of CAMP required input models #18

jesus-gorronogoitia opened this issue Sep 4, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@jesus-gorronogoitia
Copy link

Characteristics

  • Issue Type: feature
  • Reproducibility: N/A
  • Severity: feature
  • Tool/Service/Component: CAMP, latest version
  • Execution Environment: All platforms
  • Reporter: Jesús [email protected]>

Description

Current CAMP documentation does not explicitly describes the required the CAMP input files for configuring the configuration amplification domain model (features.yml, images.yml, genimages.yml, composite.yml, variables.yml) including instructions to generate other domain input models. Examples are given for XWiki and Atos use cases, but not instructions to provide other model instances for other scenarios. Therefore, the application of CAMP in order scenarios requires the support of CAMP technical team.
Therefore, the metamodel of every CAMP input model should be specify in CAMP documentation (or reference to the specifications of these metamodels should be provided) together with examples (code snippets) for relevant modeling elements (e.g. modeling a feature variations, image building rules, etc).

Steps to reproduce

N/A

Other files and URLs

Relationships

See #14 for a requirement to specify CAMP input model locations.

Help on issue template

Preview to follow the link or open file .github/ISSUE_DOC.md

@vassik
Copy link
Contributor

vassik commented Sep 11, 2018

We describe models partially (an explanation is given on the xwiki example) though I agree that it needs more detailed explanation. We will fix this in the upcoming releases of the tool.

@vassik vassik closed this as completed in 2a94f7a Sep 17, 2018
@vassik vassik reopened this Sep 17, 2018
@fchauvel
Copy link
Member

I tried to describe how to describe the model needed by CAMP. Please check the documentation, and especially, the following pages:

I thus close this issue, but feel free to reopen should you not find what you were looking for.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants