Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Branin Function #449

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 13, 2023
Merged

Update Branin Function #449

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 13, 2023

Conversation

Spinachboul
Copy link
Contributor

What Modified?

Branin Function

How Modified?

Added an additional parameter time_step to simulate dynamic changes.
The randn() function adds random noise to the function output at each time step.

Why Modified?

This introduces variability, making the function's landscape more challenging for optimization algorithms.
Also the suitable noise parameter mimics the real world scenario where the objective functions might not be so smooth!

Any additional change, recommendation highly appreciated

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Is this supposed to be a tutorial? Benchmark?

@Spinachboul
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually it's a way of improving the branin function by including the element of noise_step

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (33d3eaa) 77.93% compared to head (9a0ef6f) 78.05%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #449      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.93%   78.05%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines        3154     3154              
==========================================
+ Hits         2458     2462       +4     
+ Misses        696      692       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 1e0848e into SciML:master Dec 13, 2023
6 of 7 checks passed
@Spinachboul
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ChrisRackauckas
Thanks for merging my branch with the master branch. Could you tell what all functions do you think can be improved, currently I am working on genetic algorithm

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

I think GEKPLS would be one to take a look at #362

@Spinachboul
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think GEKPLS would be one to take a look at #362

Sure! I would certainly look into that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants