-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 373
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add MIT release clause #5388
base: dev/feature
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add MIT release clause #5388
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
code-conventions.md should also be modified, it discusses the license.
This keeps an repo-wide public record
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
An update to the bottom of the main README is required.
bd134d0
to
3f08853
Compare
@APickledWalrus any news on this? It's been over a year of no activity. |
I've addressed the existing comments. Assuming this is a satisfactory solution for the goal, this should be able to be merged. |
can we instead ask users to dual license as both gpl and mit? this will protect us in case it ever is an issue with bukkit being gpl |
Description
In the interest of promoting a better open-source community I am proposing adding a new file to track contributors who have elected to release their code under the MIT license. This file will prove useful in the future if we wish to relicense Skript (specifically the API portion) under a new license (like MIT).
Target Minecraft Versions: any
Requirements: n/a
Related Issues: none?