You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the great repo!
I find that CCC-wav2vec 2.0 performs especially well on SUPERB SE task, surpassing WavLM Large with a large margin.
I am trying to reproduce it but I not yet successfully get the similar score. (PESQ around 3)
May I ask how did you fine-tune CCC-wav2vec 2.0 on SUPERB SE?
Specifically, what are the tuning hyper-parameters? (e.g. batch size and learning rate)
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
P.s. I tried the default batch size and learning rate 1e-4 and 5e-5, and adding --upstream_feature_normalize to apply layer norm on the representation, the best result I get is around 2.6 PESQ.
Hi!
Thanks for the great repo!
I find that CCC-wav2vec 2.0 performs especially well on SUPERB SE task, surpassing WavLM Large with a large margin.
I am trying to reproduce it but I not yet successfully get the similar score. (PESQ around 3)
May I ask how did you fine-tune CCC-wav2vec 2.0 on SUPERB SE?
Specifically, what are the tuning hyper-parameters? (e.g. batch size and learning rate)
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: