fix description by restoring lost value

[rettinghaus]

Small fix for Chinese description in gap where obviously one value got lost. Restored it from the similar Korean description.

[peterstadler]

While this PR reintroduces a missing value (which was deleted in 05323e6), I think the more accurate way would be to remove the sample values from the <desc> completely as it is the case with other languages like English an Spanish. Here, the terms of the sample values are given in translation in the <gloss> to the <valItem>s:

TEI/P5/Source/Specs/gap.xml

Lines 63 to 110 in 2e33676

	<valList type="semi">
	<valItem ident="cancelled">
	<gloss xml:lang="en" versionDate="2017-02-06">cancelled</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="de">abgebrochen</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="it">cancellato</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="es">cancelado</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="fr">biffé</gloss>
	</valItem>
	<valItem ident="deleted">
	<gloss xml:lang="en" versionDate="2017-02-07">deleted</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-07" xml:lang="de">getilgt</gloss>
	</valItem>
	<valItem ident="editorial">
	<gloss xml:lang="en" versionDate="2021-02-01">editorial</gloss>
	<desc versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="en">for features omitted from
	transcription due to editorial policy</desc>
	<desc versionDate="2017-02-07" xml:lang="de">für Bestandteile,
	die aus editorischen Gründen nicht übertragen wurden</desc>
	</valItem>
	<valItem ident="illegible">
	<gloss xml:lang="en" versionDate="2017-02-06">illegible</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-07" xml:lang="de">unleserlich</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="it">illegibile</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="es">ilegible</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="fr">illisible</gloss>
	</valItem>
	<valItem ident="inaudible">
	<gloss xml:lang="en" versionDate="2017-02-06">inaudible</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="de">nicht hörbar</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="it">incomprensibile</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="es">inaudible</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="fr">inaudible</gloss>
	</valItem>
	<valItem ident="irrelevant">
	<gloss xml:lang="en" versionDate="2017-02-06">irrelevant</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="de">irrelevant</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="it">irrilevante</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="es">irrelevante</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="fr">non pertinent</gloss>
	</valItem>
	<valItem ident="sampling">
	<gloss xml:lang="en" versionDate="2017-02-06">sampling</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="de">Auswahl</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="it">campionatura</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="es">ejemplificación</gloss>
	<gloss versionDate="2017-02-06" xml:lang="fr">échantillonnage</gloss>
	</valItem>
	</valList>

[rettinghaus]

Then this should be done by someone who actually speaks these languages.

[sydb]

Note that this PR is (as far as @trishaoconnor and I are concerned) is a GO for merge, but @peterstadler is right, we should find people who speak Korean and Taiwanese to correct the descriptions by removing the enumeration of values and whatever bit before them would no longer belong.