Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Variable name mismatch between FTP data, test data and code expectations #13

Open
serbinsh opened this issue Jan 28, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@serbinsh
Copy link

Hello

I am looking at using your python package to work with SMOS radar soil moisture, however I am noticing some inconsistencies between the data variable names on the FTP, the test data and the expectations of functions like SMOSImg

Specifically, the test data includes Quality_Flag as a variable, but the data available on https://data.catds.fr/cecsm/Land_products/L3_SMOS_IC_Soil_Moisture/ does not seem to include that variable anymore, at least the few files I have tried to work with so far

Screen Shot 2023-01-28 at 3 03 11 PM

Is it possible that either the function was updated and no long matches the latest version of the data or the latest data version is missing that variable? Or is this user error?

I am trying to work through the examples in the docs
https://smos.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

Thanks!

@serbinsh
Copy link
Author

It looks like the data on the HTTPs are missing both Quality_Flag and Processing_Flag

@wpreimes
Copy link
Member

wpreimes commented Feb 7, 2023

Hi, thanks for pointing it out. I assume it was changed in one of the later versions. I will include it in the next version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants