-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
1.19.2 dankless dock drain #206
Comments
Weird, I'll try to reproduce, but an empty dock shouldn't have a frequency. |
Could you run /data get on the dock when it is empty? |
Yes, I'll replicate this in a moment and get you that data.
…On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 9:31 PM Tfarcenim ***@***.***> wrote:
Could you run /data get on the dock when it is empty?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#206 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA5TJCE4HEHPGG4S74AHUADXP5MWZANCNFSM6AAAAAAZOUZNAA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sorry, that was a long moment, had to run my mom to the ER. She's ok now. It wasn't major, but it certainly seemed major at the time. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Discovered a repeatable issue with the dock, and may or may not have anything to-do item pipez from the Pipez mod.
When removing the dank from a dock, the dock will sometimes get confused and think there is a dank of the same frequency in it. This allows you to drain your active dank in the field without having to worry about the dock having a dank of the same frequency within itself.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: