Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nightly feedstock build failed #151

Open
github-actions bot opened this issue Nov 16, 2024 · 24 comments
Open

Nightly feedstock build failed #151

github-actions bot opened this issue Nov 16, 2024 · 24 comments

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 16, 2024

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary


https://app.shortcut.com/tiledb-inc/story/59851

Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

1 similar comment
Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

@jdblischak
Copy link
Collaborator

Starting with the nightly build on Friday, Nov 15th, there is a test failure only for the linux-aarch64 builds:

=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tiledb/tests/test_schema_evolution.py::test_schema_evolution_drop_fixed_attribute_and_add_back_as_var_sized - AssertionError: 
Arrays are not equal

Mismatched elements: 10 / 10 (100%)
 ACTUAL: array([b'', b'', b'', b'', b'', b'', b'', b'', b'', b''], dtype=object)
 DESIRED: array([b'\x80', b'\x80', b'\x80', b'\x80', b'\x80', b'\x80', b'\x80',
       b'\x80', b'\x80', b'\x80'], dtype='|S1')
== 1 failed, 526 passed, 2 skipped, 7 xfailed, 1 xpassed in 766.48s (0:12:46) ==
WARNING: Tests failed for tiledb-py-0.32.5.2024_11_15-py39h697c32b_0.conda - moving package to /home/conda/feedstock_root/build_artifacts/broken

@jdblischak
Copy link
Collaborator

The failing test was added on Friday in TileDB-Inc/TileDB-Py#2083. @kounelisagis could you please investigate why this new test only fails on linux-aarch64?

@kounelisagis
Copy link
Member

Strange that this check is OS-dependent. Does this mean that the data in the TileDB array differ depending on the OS, or is it just a representation issue? I believe it’s the latter. In any case, I don’t think this is a deeper issue; it seems to be a matter of modifying the assertion. I will investigate further tomorrow and make a fix in a PR.

cc: @bekadavis9

Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

@kounelisagis
Copy link
Member

All builds fail because of this: TileDB-Inc/TileDB-Py#2111 (comment)
Expected - working on this.

@teo-tsirpanis
Copy link
Member

This test gets skipped in TileDB-Py CI. From a quick look the behavior exhibited in linux-aarch64 seems to be the correct one. 🤔

Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

@jdblischak
Copy link
Collaborator

Now we're back to only the linux-aarch64 test failures that originally opened this Issue. Though unclear if the deprecated functions problem has been fixed or not, since we haven't yet merged #152 to always remove the deprecated functions.

Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

1 similar comment
Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

2 similar comments
Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

@jdblischak
Copy link
Collaborator

@kounelisagis the linux-aarch64 tiledb-py-feedstock builds continue to fail the test test_schema_evolution.py::test_schema_evolution_drop_fixed_attribute_and_add_back_as_var_sized. Is there an associated story and/or PR for fixing this?

Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

3 similar comments
Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

Copy link
Author

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

2 similar comments
Copy link
Author

github-actions bot commented Dec 1, 2024

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

Copy link
Author

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Nightly feedstock build failure for TileDB-Py%20Feedstock%20Testing at https://dev.azure.com/TileDB-Inc/CI/_build?definitionId=5&_a=summary

@jdblischak
Copy link
Collaborator

Current status: linux-aarch64 builds still have failing test, but potential fix pending in TileDB-Inc/TileDB-Py#2116

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants