You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should we have boolean beautifier options at all? It seems that for many options that initially seem like an 'on' or 'off' kind of thing, people will later realize that there is a third alternative. Having everything be an enum from the start would enable us to add new alternatives more gracefully. many clang-format options seem to be specified with this in mind in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A lot of the existing Unibeautify options were copied from Atom-Beautify. I definitely think they need improving, both in terms of the possible option values supported and also if they should be renamed ( #182 ).
I've been thinking about this for a while. Quoting from here:
Should we have boolean beautifier options at all? It seems that for many options that initially seem like an 'on' or 'off' kind of thing, people will later realize that there is a third alternative. Having everything be an enum from the start would enable us to add new alternatives more gracefully. many clang-format options seem to be specified with this in mind in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: