-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 622
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AES-GCM runtime availability check, Advertise / initialize AES-GCM cipher only if supported #197
Draft
past-due
wants to merge
3
commits into
ValveSoftware:master
Choose a base branch
from
past-due:aes_runtime_availability_check
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -1037,14 +1037,17 @@ void CSteamNetworkConnectionBase::ClearCrypto() | |
void CSteamNetworkConnectionBase::ClearLocalCrypto() | ||
{ | ||
AssertLocksHeldByCurrentThread(); | ||
m_eNegotiatedCipher = k_ESteamNetworkingSocketsCipher_INVALID; | ||
m_cbEncryptionOverhead = k_cbAESGCMTagSize; | ||
m_keyExchangePrivateKeyLocal.Wipe(); | ||
m_msgCryptLocal.Clear(); | ||
m_msgSignedCryptLocal.Clear(); | ||
m_bCryptKeysValid = false; | ||
m_cryptContextSend.Wipe(); | ||
m_cryptContextRecv.Wipe(); | ||
if (m_eNegotiatedCipher != k_ESteamNetworkingSocketsCipher_NULL) | ||
{ | ||
m_cryptContextSend.Wipe(); | ||
m_cryptContextRecv.Wipe(); | ||
} | ||
m_eNegotiatedCipher = k_ESteamNetworkingSocketsCipher_INVALID; | ||
m_cbEncryptionOverhead = k_cbAESGCMTagSize; | ||
m_cryptIVSend.Wipe(); | ||
m_cryptIVRecv.Wipe(); | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -1219,19 +1222,29 @@ void CSteamNetworkConnectionBase::SetCryptoCipherList() | |
// V | ||
case 0: | ||
// Not allowed | ||
m_msgCryptLocal.add_ciphers( k_ESteamNetworkingSocketsCipher_AES_256_GCM ); | ||
if (AES_GCM_CipherContext::IsAvailable()) | ||
{ | ||
m_msgCryptLocal.add_ciphers( k_ESteamNetworkingSocketsCipher_AES_256_GCM ); | ||
} | ||
Assert( m_msgCryptLocal.ciphers_size() > 0 ); | ||
break; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this situation should be fatal to the connection. (If the connection is configured to require encryption, it should be fatal if encryption is not available.) |
||
|
||
case 1: | ||
// Allowed, but prefer encrypted | ||
m_msgCryptLocal.add_ciphers( k_ESteamNetworkingSocketsCipher_AES_256_GCM ); | ||
if (AES_GCM_CipherContext::IsAvailable()) | ||
{ | ||
m_msgCryptLocal.add_ciphers( k_ESteamNetworkingSocketsCipher_AES_256_GCM ); | ||
} | ||
m_msgCryptLocal.add_ciphers( k_ESteamNetworkingSocketsCipher_NULL ); | ||
break; | ||
|
||
case 2: | ||
// Allowed, preferred | ||
m_msgCryptLocal.add_ciphers( k_ESteamNetworkingSocketsCipher_NULL ); | ||
m_msgCryptLocal.add_ciphers( k_ESteamNetworkingSocketsCipher_AES_256_GCM ); | ||
if (AES_GCM_CipherContext::IsAvailable()) | ||
{ | ||
m_msgCryptLocal.add_ciphers( k_ESteamNetworkingSocketsCipher_AES_256_GCM ); | ||
} | ||
break; | ||
|
||
case 3: | ||
|
@@ -1693,13 +1706,16 @@ bool CSteamNetworkConnectionBase::BFinishCryptoHandshake( bool bServer ) | |
V_memcpy( pStart, &expandTemp, sizeof(SHA256Digest_t) ); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Set encryption keys into the contexts, and set parameters | ||
if ( | ||
!m_cryptContextSend.Init( cryptKeySend.m_buf, cryptKeySend.k_nSize, m_cryptIVSend.k_nSize, k_cbAESGCMTagSize ) | ||
|| !m_cryptContextRecv.Init( cryptKeyRecv.m_buf, cryptKeyRecv.k_nSize, m_cryptIVRecv.k_nSize, k_cbAESGCMTagSize ) ) | ||
if (m_eNegotiatedCipher != k_ESteamNetworkingSocketsCipher_NULL) | ||
{ | ||
ConnectionState_ProblemDetectedLocally( k_ESteamNetConnectionEnd_Remote_BadCrypt, "Error initializing crypto" ); | ||
return false; | ||
// Set encryption keys into the contexts, and set parameters | ||
if ( | ||
!m_cryptContextSend.Init( cryptKeySend.m_buf, cryptKeySend.k_nSize, m_cryptIVSend.k_nSize, k_cbAESGCMTagSize ) | ||
|| !m_cryptContextRecv.Init( cryptKeyRecv.m_buf, cryptKeyRecv.k_nSize, m_cryptIVRecv.k_nSize, k_cbAESGCMTagSize ) ) | ||
{ | ||
ConnectionState_ProblemDetectedLocally( k_ESteamNetConnectionEnd_Remote_BadCrypt, "Error initializing crypto" ); | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
// | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be legal to always wipe these, even if they aren't initialized?
Stepping back:
If we're going to support more than one cipher we need to refactor this. because
m_cryptContextSend
is too generic of a name if it is always going to be an instance of AES-GCM. We probably should add a new abstract interfaceISymmetricEncryptContext
, with two virtual methods,Encrypt()
and the destructor. We would never "wipe" a context, we would just delete it, and the destructor would always securely wipe it.AES_GCM_EncryptContext
would implement this interface. (The old mix-in interface design pattern --- yes, multiple-base classes.) So then we would havestd::unique_ptr<ISymmetricEncryptContext> m_pEncryptContext
. (And the same for decrypt.) So you would deal in concrete types when you were initializing, but once initialization was complete, you would just have the abstract type.There's a lot of stuff going on in the Steam branch that needs to be merged and cleaned up in crypto land (recently upgraded to a new version of OpenSSL), but if you want to take a stab at it, I can pull that and then I can clean this up when I get back in sync with Steam.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd debated that, but I wasn't sure how extensive a refactor would be eagerly welcomed. 😄
Will take a look when I have a moment. 👍