Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the "3D + SAM" method mentioned in the paper: #36

Open
XXXCARREY opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

About the "3D + SAM" method mentioned in the paper: #36

XXXCARREY opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@XXXCARREY
Copy link

I notice that the best results on Class-agnostic evaluation on ScanNet200 are based on the "3D + SAM" model. Does this SAM refer to the original SAM? I checked the code, and it seems that the segmenter2d does not include an option for the original SAM; it only has options like Grounded-SAM, etc. Could you please tell me how to reproduce the highest-performing method mentioned in the paper? Thank you very much.

@PhucNDA
Copy link
Collaborator

PhucNDA commented Sep 26, 2024

Hi @XXXCARREY,

Yes, It is the AutoMaskGenSAM from SegmentAnything-HQ. We haven't included it in the current version of the source code. Thanks for letting us know. We are currently supporting these types of segmenter2D (https://github.com/VinAIResearch/Open3DIS/blob/main/configs/scannet200.yaml#L19C2-L19C3). We will add it, soon.

Best,
PhucNDA.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants