Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Heirlooms Kept (Rarity/Name) #176

Open
Fofalus opened this issue Jul 19, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

Heirlooms Kept (Rarity/Name) #176

Fofalus opened this issue Jul 19, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@Fofalus
Copy link

Fofalus commented Jul 19, 2016

It would be nice if it kept heirlooms you had named and always kept higher rarity in storage. I have been letting it do many fast runs to 125 and am never sure if I lost out on rare heirlooms.

@genbtc
Copy link
Collaborator

genbtc commented Jul 20, 2016

I have invented a "Protect Heirloom" button that will prevent the Auto Heirloom from recycling it for some reason. This will be coming soon. If you did not realize, The "Auto Heirlooms" function assesses which heirlooms are best, based on the rarity and mods and sends the rest to be recycled on portal.

@Fofalus
Copy link
Author

Fofalus commented Jul 20, 2016

I saw your fork of this and have moved to that with its protect function. I don't believe that it always keeps based on rarity because I have caught it throwing away legendary items to keep epic items in their place. If I am understanding correctly it should always keep legendary items above epic. This may be working correctly in your fork and not the original version I was using I am unsure.

@genbtc
Copy link
Collaborator

genbtc commented Jul 20, 2016

no, they are identical. Rarity takes precedence above mods, but the mods CAN outweigh rarity, and in that case, it would be such a great outweighal that you should listen to it that, it was indeed a sheit legendary.

@Fofalus
Copy link
Author

Fofalus commented Jul 20, 2016

Ah the tooltip says Rarity trumps all stat evaluation but I guess that only applies to carrying. It was a very garbage one for normal purposes but one I had kept for scientist runs.

@genbtc
Copy link
Collaborator

genbtc commented Jul 20, 2016

yes now im confused. It does say it trumps all stat evaluations, so how you think it threw the legendary away I do not know. I will look into it.

@Fofalus
Copy link
Author

Fofalus commented Jul 20, 2016

I still have the very garbage shield and an equally terrible magnificent staff. I will let it continue running with them unprotected to see if I can reproduce it.

@KMStanton
Copy link

it doesb't keep the best heirloom by rarity, what's wrong?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants