-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use one LocalVocab
for each block during lazy evaluation
#1567
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
053d958
Make `LocalVocab` part of generator for lazy results
RobinTF 6dddf82
Fix spelling errors
RobinTF 91aee60
Fix some sonarcloud issues
RobinTF e4ab76d
Use simpler merge algorithms
RobinTF bd3c79c
Apply simple refactorings
RobinTF 918e501
Add convenience constructor
RobinTF 2c6556b
Add convenience `Result::Generator`type
RobinTF 45352b8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'ad-freiburg/master' into local-vocab-ge…
RobinTF 224beb2
Keep `LocalVocab`around to fix lifetime issues
RobinTF 311ca96
Address PR comments
RobinTF File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is necessarily correct.
If your group is very long (e.g. from 5 IdTables ago) , then you also have to store the corresponding local vocab from exactly that group.
So you have to probably have alocal vocab that is associated with the
currentGroupBlock
and updated exactly when you do thecommitRow
call (because then you implicitly updated the next group block ,isn't that true?