Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

strategy improvement in intersect() using SignatureSB branch #31

Open
jakobkroeker opened this issue Dec 5, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@jakobkroeker
Copy link

option(redSB);
LIB "primdec.lib";
ring rng = (integer),(x,y,z),(lp(2),lp(1),C);
ideal I = 115*x*y*z^2-67*y^2*z^2,-107*x*y*z^2-10*y^2-148*z;
ideal J = 146*z^3-46*z^2+78*z-93,-119*x^2*y-105*x*y*z;
intersect(I,J);

M2 code:

R = ZZ[x,y,z]

I = ideal { 115*x*y*z^2-67*y^2*z^2, -107*x*y*z^2-10*y^2-148*z }
J = ideal { 146*z^3-46*z^2+78*z-93, -119*x^2*y-105*x*y*z }

IJ = intersect(I,J);

can you reproduce this?

more examples:

option(redSB);
LIB "primdec.lib";
ring rng = (integer),(x,y,z),(lp(2),lp(1),C);
ideal I = 97*x*z+68*y^2,-121*x^3*z-105*y;
ideal J = 132*x*y^2+123*x*z+129*z^2-6,57*x^2+72*x*y;
intersect(I,J);
@adipopescu
Copy link
Owner

no segfault but examples run for ever - strategy should be improved! M2 does this in a couple of minutes. Preinteger check does not give us anything.

@adipopescu adipopescu changed the title segfault in intersect() using SignatureSB branch strategy improvement in intersect() using SignatureSB branch Mar 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants