Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dependent steps - should they be accessible without their dependencies? #969

Open
edan-bainglass opened this issue Dec 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@edan-bainglass
Copy link
Member

edan-bainglass commented Dec 13, 2024

Question

Should a user be able to explore steps beyond unconfirmed steps?

Pro

Users get to explore the app.

Comment: the same could be achieved by visiting the docs, where we could consider adding a gallery.

Con

If changes are made in a step beyond an unconfirmed step, the confirmation of the earlier step will reset those changes. This is (for now) intended behavior, but it may be confusing for first-time explorers.

Comment: resetting on confirmation change is potentially harsh, but the alternative may require significant development.

Possible solution

Replace step content with a warning if dependencies aren't met.

image

Comments

  1. The above will also happen if one confirms a step, then goes back and makes changes. Subsequent steps will revert to the warning
  2. This does not actually prevent exploration. It simply limits it to the way the app is meant to be used. So there's a self-documenting value to this solution. Users learn how to use the app by making "mistakes"
@edan-bainglass edan-bainglass added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 13, 2024
@edan-bainglass edan-bainglass self-assigned this Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant