BTW, here is for the reference all disabled rules in our project. Maybe there is something else worth to be enabled in addition to core::0123::resource-annotation if this will make api-linter works better for some internal reasons.

[Gabriel681]

          BTW, here is for the reference all disabled rules in our project. Maybe there is something else worth to be enabled in addition to `core::0123::resource-annotation` if this will make `api-linter` works better for some internal reasons.

  disabled_rules:
    - 'core::0123::resource-annotation'     # We are not Google, so we don't use it.
    - 'core::0127::http-annotation'         # We do not provide OpenAPI for most of our services.
    - 'core::0131::request-name-reference'  # We are not Google, so we don't use it.
    - 'core::0131::method-signature'        # Not useful in Go code.
    - 'core::0132::request-parent-required' # We mostly use top-level resources.
    - 'core::0133::method-signature'        # Not useful in Go code.
    - 'core::0133::http-uri-parent'         # We mostly use top-level resources.
    - 'core::0133::request-parent-required' # We mostly use top-level resources.
    - 'core::0134::method-signature'        # Not useful in Go code.
    - 'core::0135::request-name-reference'  # We are not Google, so we don't use it.
    - 'core::0135::method-signature'        # Not useful in Go code.
    - 'core::0140::uri'                     # We prefer to name field with URLs as url, not uri.
    - 'core::0191::java-outer-classname'    # We don't use Java.
    - 'core::0191::java-multiple-files'     # We don't use Java.
    - 'core::0191::java-package'            # We don't use Java.
    - 'core::0191::proto-package'           # https://github.com/googleapis/api-linter/issues/952
    - 'core::0215::versioned-packages'      # Allow omitted version for v1.
    - 'core::0233::request-parent-field'    # We mostly use top-level resources.

Originally posted by @powerman in #1176 (comment)