Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Logging improvements for new async result store and request handling #55

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2023

Conversation

zhill
Copy link
Member

@zhill zhill commented Aug 31, 2023

No description provided.

@zhill zhill added the Hold/Do Not Merge Hold for review approval and assignee label Aug 31, 2023
@zhill zhill force-pushed the logging_improvements branch 2 times, most recently from ff71a37 to dd6838b Compare August 31, 2023 23:07
Adds more debugging to handle additional complexity of an async result
store.

Updates readme.md to indicate that the sequence diagram will get updated
as well. That diagram will update in a future commit.

Signed-off-by: Zach Hill <[email protected]>
@zhill zhill force-pushed the logging_improvements branch from 0f625e4 to fa34826 Compare August 31, 2023 23:17
@zhill zhill marked this pull request as ready for review August 31, 2023 23:18
@zhill zhill changed the title wip: Logging improvements Logging improvements for new async result store and request handling Aug 31, 2023
@zhill zhill removed the Hold/Do Not Merge Hold for review approval and assignee label Aug 31, 2023
@zhill zhill added this to the v1.1.0 milestone Aug 31, 2023
Copy link
Member

@bradleyjones bradleyjones left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@zhill zhill merged commit cbe76ac into main Aug 31, 2023
3 checks passed
@bradleyjones bradleyjones deleted the logging_improvements branch August 31, 2023 23:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants