grbl v1.1 support

[michelcve]

Any chance that grblWeb will support the new grbl v1.1 protocol soon?

[andrewhodel]

Probably not for a few months, I am busy with another project. Thanks, Andrew

…

On Jan 13, 2017, at 7:47 AM, michelcve ***@***.***> wrote: Any chance that grblWeb will support the new grbl v1.1 protocol soon? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[hrobeers]

@michelcve Is it the new jogging commands you are aiming at? Or are there other protocol features you miss?

[michelcve]

Wow, that comment was a year old, so I actually forgot about it ;-)

I've since moved to a different (commercial) product for my CNC, so I've kind of lost interest in grblWeb, sorry.

[Protoneer]

What did you move to?

…

On 11 Jan 2018 4:55 a.m., "michelcve" ***@***.***> wrote: Wow, that comment was a year old, so I actually forgot about it ;-) I've since moved to a different (commercial) product for my CNC, so I've kind of lost interest in grblWeb, sorry. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#23 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADqFI_YDpi517ji8KoicPc4CKwjGe7rdks5tJN2AgaJpZM4Li5Tt> .

[hrobeers]

@michelcve I actually just discovered grblweb and chose is because it does not require a screen attached to my PC that talks to the controller.
As a software developer I can modify this code to my liking, so I'm wondering how grblweb turned you off.

[michelcve]

I switched to EstlCam. It's very reasonably priced, and does everything I need it to do.

Being a software developer, I understand that having the source code and being able to modify things is nice. But in the end, Estlcam simply does everything I want. And ultimately I started CNCing for the CNCing, not the programming (enough other projects to satisfy my programming needs anyway ;-)).

[Hoangthoi]

[Hoangthoi]

I installed grblweb raspberry pi 3. But it was like this, could anyone help me?