New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

clarify why Bearer Vouchers are even mentioned #37

Open

mcr opened this issue Aug 26, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #66

Member

mcr commented Aug 26, 2023

> 10) Lines 316, 317, 359:  Is "Bearer out-of-scope [voucher]" the same
> as "Bearer Voucher"?  Presumably you mean that Bearer Vouchers are out
> of scope.  Why not simply omit them from the table then and state that
> separately - this would be clearer.  As a side note, this is the only
> place where the TOFU term is mentioned; since it is scope is it really
> needed (see also comment 5)?

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

mcr linked a pull request

that will close this issue

Bearer vouchers #66

Open

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment