Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BREAKING: Indexing Sequence Number #887

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

Jeevananthan-23
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #886

Description

Currently, IW can determine the order in which operations were executed by updating the methods to return a long instead of void. If you are a caller who does not require this information, you can ignore the returned long. Additionally, this change enables the removal of the TrackingIndexWriter wrapper class with similar functionality by returning a long for each operation but with weaker guarantees.

@Jeevananthan-23 Jeevananthan-23 marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2023 16:38
@NightOwl888
Copy link
Contributor

Closing for the reasons mentioned in #886 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for Ordering of Indexing with SeqNo
2 participants