-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
App lifecycle management: add support for periodic task definitions #537
Comments
Can you give some use cases? Why should this be handled by the pod lifecycle rather than within the app itself? This is tightly related to #276 |
This is for applications that don't support re-scheduling themselves because they are not daemons and don't come with one, and which you would typically put into your crontab.
|
OK, but so far it's unclear why this shouldn't be handled at a higher level Stefan Junker [email protected] schrieb am Di., 17. Nov. 2015
|
AFAIK an orchestration layer or an init system is not a specification for a pod. I think that the pod spec is where this belongs along with other metrics about my applications which are already there. Why would I want to split up this information? |
The pod lifecycle can rapidly become arbitrarily complex, so thus far we've On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Stefan Junker [email protected]
|
I couldn't identify this problem in any other of the lifecycle open issues.
Polling still exists nowadays and it would be handy to have periodic app support in the spec.
I imagine this so that one can define what happens to an application on what exit codes.
At least the following information is necessary for a correct implementation of this feature:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: