You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current Docker image used is articnetworkorg/squirrel:1.0.8 which is 3.8 GB. The base image for this is condaforge/mambaforge (444 MB). The image built from the bioconda recipe, quay.io/biocontainers/squirrel:1.0.10--pyhdfd78af_0, which uses a very similar build to the default squirrel Dockerfile, but with some optimisations for size, is 1.1 GB.
Can this workflow use the biocontainer based image? For people with poor Internet this would save 2.7 GB of download.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there
The current Docker image used is
articnetworkorg/squirrel:1.0.8
which is 3.8 GB. The base image for this iscondaforge/mambaforge
(444 MB). The image built from the bioconda recipe,quay.io/biocontainers/squirrel:1.0.10--pyhdfd78af_0
, which uses a very similar build to the default squirrel Dockerfile, but with some optimisations for size, is 1.1 GB.Can this workflow use the biocontainer based image? For people with poor Internet this would save 2.7 GB of download.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: