This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.

Asynchronous instead of synchronous #26

Open

alessioalex opened this issue May 7, 2014 · 1 comment

Labels

alessioalex commented May 7, 2014

I was just wondering if git-utils can be changed to be asynchronous instead of synchronous (and blocking) like it is now.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Contributor

nathansobo commented May 7, 2014

That's definitely something we'd be interested in. We'd probably want to retain synchronous functionality with a *Sync variant of all the methods.

probablycorey added the enhancement label

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.