You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sometimes we tag multiple dev previews before releasing the final version. I guess the same could be true for alpha, beta, rc and other pre release methods.
I opened a separate PR for this, as it seems less trivial than #18
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A pre-release version MAY be denoted by appending a hyphen and a series of dot separated identifiers immediately following the patch version. Identifiers MUST comprise only ASCII alphanumerics and hyphen [0-9A-Za-z-]. Identifiers MUST NOT be empty. Numeric identifiers MUST NOT include leading zeroes. Pre-release versions have a lower precedence than the associated normal version. A pre-release version indicates that the version is unstable and might not satisfy the intended compatibility requirements as denoted by its associated normal version. Examples: 1.0.0-alpha, 1.0.0-alpha.1, 1.0.0-0.3.7, 1.0.0-x.7.z.92
If we removed the constraint that pre-release names must be one of a specific set and instead validate according to SemVer's rules above would that solve your use case? eg:
This is somewhat related to #18
Our dev preview tags look like
X.Y.Z-dev.A
Sometimes we tag multiple dev previews before releasing the final version. I guess the same could be true for alpha, beta, rc and other pre release methods.
I opened a separate PR for this, as it seems less trivial than #18
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: