You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, UNF stores lattice cells -> nucleotide references.
However, it seems that it might be desired to also store the nucleotide -> lattice (cell, ...) references.
How this should be stored in UNF? Will it be easy to manage / keep track of when modifying UNF files?
Idea nr. 1:
The nucleotide now contains altPosition field, storing its (freeform) 3D position in the world.
A field called lattPosition could be added storing lattice-based position (how would it look?) .
The existing rules for determining nucleotide position would still apply (alternative position > lattice position).
However, I feel like this may introduce some redundancy to the stored data (as the lattice will reference nucleotides and the nucleotides will reference lattice at the same time).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, UNF stores lattice cells -> nucleotide references.
However, it seems that it might be desired to also store the nucleotide -> lattice (cell, ...) references.
How this should be stored in UNF? Will it be easy to manage / keep track of when modifying UNF files?
Idea nr. 1:
The nucleotide now contains altPosition field, storing its (freeform) 3D position in the world.
A field called lattPosition could be added storing lattice-based position (how would it look?) .
The existing rules for determining nucleotide position would still apply (alternative position > lattice position).
However, I feel like this may introduce some redundancy to the stored data (as the lattice will reference nucleotides and the nucleotides will reference lattice at the same time).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: