Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✅ test: Update the test workflow to set the timeout to 20 minutes #5

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bendoerr
Copy link
Member

@bendoerr bendoerr commented Aug 21, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced testing process for Go projects with dynamic versioning and caching to improve build efficiency.
    • Introduced custom shell command for executing tests and generating standardized JUnit reports.
  • Improvements

    • Updated the test summary action for better visibility and reporting, ensuring summaries are generated regardless of test outcomes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The workflow for testing a Go project has been significantly enhanced to improve maintainability and efficiency. Key changes include adopting a dynamic Go version management system derived from the project's module file, implementing caching to optimize build times, and replacing a specific GitHub Action with a custom command for running tests and generating JUnit reports. Additionally, the summary action has been updated for improved visibility, ensuring a robust CI/CD process.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/test.yml Replaced static Go version with dynamic management from go.mod, added caching, replaced a specific testing action with a custom shell command, and updated the test summary action to improve report generation and visibility.

Poem

🐇 In the land of code, we hop and play,
With smoother tests to light our way.
A version change, a cache to save,
JUnit reports, how bold and brave!
So let us code, with joy and cheer,
For every change, brings progress near! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Aug 21, 2024

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits e8764ca..3c40a4c. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Terraform LogoTerraform✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8764ca and f2316cc.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/test.yml (3)

25-26: Dynamic Go version management and caching are well-implemented.

Switching to a go-version-file and enabling caching enhances flexibility and reduces build times, aligning the workflow with the project's dependencies.


39-43: Verify the paths input for the test-summary action.

The paths input is set to ${{ inputs.sourceDir }}/report.xml. Ensure that inputs.sourceDir is defined and correctly points to the directory containing report.xml.

If sourceDir is not defined, update the path to the correct location of report.xml.


33-37: Custom test execution command enhances control and reporting.

The use of a custom shell command to run tests and generate JUnit reports provides more control over the testing process and standardizes reporting.

Ensure that go-junit-report is correctly installed and accessible in the environment.

@bendoerr bendoerr force-pushed the ci/extend-terratest-timeout branch from f2316cc to 6958ef3 Compare August 21, 2024 13:37
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2316cc and 6958ef3.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/test.yml (3)

27-28: LGTM! Dynamic Go version management and caching enabled.

Using go-version-file for dynamic version management and enabling caching are excellent improvements for consistency and efficiency.


35-39: LGTM! Custom shell command for testing with extended timeout.

The custom command enhances control over the testing process and aligns with the PR objective to increase the timeout.


41-44: LGTM! Test summary action with specified report path.

Using a specific path for the report and ensuring the summary always runs enhances visibility and integration.

@bendoerr bendoerr force-pushed the ci/extend-terratest-timeout branch from 6958ef3 to 3c40a4c Compare August 21, 2024 13:52
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6958ef3 and 3c40a4c.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/test.yml (3)

27-28: Good use of dynamic Go version management and caching.

The go-version-file ensures the Go version aligns with the project's module file, and enabling caching should improve build times.


35-40: Custom test execution command enhances flexibility.

Switching to a custom shell command for test execution allows for more control and integrates well with the CI/CD pipeline. The 20-minute timeout aligns with the PR objectives.


43-46: Improved test summary visibility.

The updated action and conditional execution ensure test results are summarized regardless of outcomes, enhancing visibility and robustness.

@bendoerr bendoerr closed this Aug 21, 2024
go install github.com/jstemmer/go-junit-report@latest
go test -timeout 20m -v ./... | tee report.txt
go-junit-report -set-exit-code < report.txt > report.xml

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[prettier] reported by reviewdog 🐶

Suggested change

@bendoerr bendoerr added bug Something isn't working cicd Adjustments to the CI/CD/Action Workflows labels Aug 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working cicd Adjustments to the CI/CD/Action Workflows
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant