You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@bharat-b7
Hi, Bharat~
I really interesting about your paper and code, but I have a question about the part probabilities:
For each query point p, you calculate a probability parts_softmax (shape: B×14×N) to judge which part of the SMPL the query point p belongs to. (The related code is in the line 124: https://github.com/bharat-b7/IPNet/blob/master/models/local_model_body_full.py)
You divide the SMPL body into 14 parts. Why is the shape of probability parts_softmax not B×(14+2)×N? What if the query point p does not belong to any part of the SMPL body (e.g. point p is inside or outside the surface)?
I cannot figured it out, and I really hope you can answer me. Thanks in advance~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We predict the label of the closest SMPL part. This independent to weather the point is inside or outside, which is handled by a separate occupancy prediction.
@bharat-b7
Hi, Bharat~
I really interesting about your paper and code, but I have a question about the part probabilities:
For each query point p, you calculate a probability parts_softmax (shape: B×14×N) to judge which part of the SMPL the query point p belongs to. (The related code is in the line 124: https://github.com/bharat-b7/IPNet/blob/master/models/local_model_body_full.py)
You divide the SMPL body into 14 parts. Why is the shape of probability parts_softmax not B×(14+2)×N? What if the query point p does not belong to any part of the SMPL body (e.g. point p is inside or outside the surface)?
I cannot figured it out, and I really hope you can answer me. Thanks in advance~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: